Challenges in Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Topics Related to the Delivery, Organization, and Financing of Health Care
- 21 June 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 142 (12_Part_2) , 1056-1065
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-142-12_part_2-200506211-00005
Abstract
Some important health policy topics, such as those related to the delivery, organization, and financing of health care, present substantial challenges to established methods for evidence synthesis. For example, such reviews may ask: What is the effect of for-profit versus not-for-profit delivery of care on patient outcomes? Or, which strategies are the most effective for promoting preventive care? This paper desc ribes innovative methods for synthesizing evidence related to the delivery, organization, and financing of health care. We found 13 systematic reviews on these topics that described novel methodologic approaches. Several of these syntheses used 3 approaches: conceptual frameworks to inform problem formulation, systematic searches that included nontraditional literature sources, and hybrid synthesis methods that included simulations to address key gaps in the literature. As the primary literature on these topics expands, so will opportunities to develop additional novel methods for performing high-quality comprehensive syntheses.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and RecommendationsThe Milbank Quarterly, 2004
- A Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Information Technologies and Decision Support Systems for Bioterrorism Preparedness and ResponseMedical Decision Making, 2004
- Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategiesHealth Technology Assessment, 2004
- Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness---which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reportsBMJ, 2002
- Getting evidence into practice: The work of the cochrane effective practice and organization of care group (EPOC)Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 2001
- Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?Published by Elsevier ,2000
- The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysisJAMA, 1999
- Effects of Computer-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Physician Performance and Patient OutcomesJAMA, 1998
- Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic ReviewsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- How Consumers and Policymakers Can Use Systematic Reviews for Decision MakingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997