Issuer Expenses and Legal Liability in Initial Public Offerings
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in The Journal of Law and Economics
- Vol. 39 (2) , 545-602
- https://doi.org/10.1086/467359
Abstract
Issuers of initial public offerings (IPOs) face numerous decisions, of which the selection and compensation of experts--the legal counsel, the auditor, and the investment banker--are among the most important. Our article investigates the role of the entire IPO coalition (including the legal counsel). In a comprehensive sample of 823 firm-commitment offerings from 1992 to 1994, we examine how expert compensation, IPO underpricing, and IPO underpricing uncertainty are related to (1) expert quality (we provide in the text our directly comparable ranking of the top 50 experts in each category in December 1994), (2) legal caution and liability, (3) nonlegal risk signals, and (4) one another. The results are contrasted with similar results from the 1980s.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Price performance of common stock new issuesPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- THE COSTS OF RAISING CAPITALJournal of Financial Research, 1996
- The underpricing of initial public offerings and the partial adjustment phenomenonJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- The Economic Determinants of Auditor Compensation in the Initial Public Offerings MarketJournal of Accounting Research, 1993
- The Pricing of Audit Services: Theory and EvidenceJournal of Accounting Research, 1980