Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform
Top Cited Papers
- 15 April 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Organization
- Vol. 57 (2) , 241-276
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818303572010
Abstract
Current international relations theory struggles to explain both the autonomy and transformation of international organizations (IOs). Previous theories either fail to account for any IO behavior that deviates from the interests of member states, or neglect the role of member states in reforming IO institutions and behavior. We propose an agency theory of IOs that can fill these gaps while also addressing two persistent problems in the study of IOs: common agency and long delegation chains. Our model explains slippage between member states' interests and IO behavior, but also suggests institutional mechanisms—staff selection, monitoring, procedural checks, and contracts—through which states can rein in errant IOs. We evaluate this argument by examining multiple institutional reforms and lending patterns at the World Bank from 1980 to 2000.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- US hegemony and the World Bank: the fight over people and ideasReview of International Political Economy, 2002
- Introduction: Parliamentary democracy and the chain of delegationEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2000
- Seeds of peaceful change: the OSCE's security community-building modelPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1998
- Trade-Environment Negotiations in the Eu, Nafta, and Wto: Regional Trajectories of Rule DevelopmentAmerican Journal of International Law, 1997
- Who Controls the Bureaucracy?: Presidential Power, Congressional Dominance, Legal Constraints, and Bureaucratic Autonomy in a Model of Multi-Institutional Policy-MakingJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 1996
- Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981–1992International Organization, 1996
- A Realist ReplyInternational Security, 1995
- Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debateInternational Organization, 1994
- Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalismInternational Organization, 1988
- The Tokyo Round: Particularistic Interests and Prospects for Stability in the Global Trading SystemInternational Studies Quarterly, 1979