Challenging the Assumptions Underlying the Use of Participatory Decision-Making Strategies
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Small Group Behavior
- Vol. 20 (4) , 428-448
- https://doi.org/10.1177/104649648902000404
Abstract
Participatory or joint decision-making strategies have been suggested as effective in groups with the task of solving unstructured problems or creating innovations. This longitudinal case study of a small task group suggests that there may be important differences between the desire of group participants to use participatory strategies and their ability to do so effectively. After 15 months, the group members failed to accomplish their task. Four problem areas that account for the lack of productivity are identified: expertise, self-oriented needs, permissive operating procedures, and formal status differences. Implications for other groups that attempt to use participatory strategies are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Facilitator- and Self-Directed GroupsSmall Group Behavior, 1977
- A Review of Research On Leaderless GroupsSmall Group Behavior, 1977
- Beyond resistance to change: Behavioral science on the firing lineOrganizational Dynamics, 1975
- Participative Decision Making: An Experimental Study in a HospitalThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973
- Personality and Organization Theory RevisitedAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1973
- Time, Emotion, and Inequality: Three Problems of Participatory GroupsThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1973
- Power Equalization Through Participation?Administrative Science Quarterly, 1971
- Effects of Hierarchical Differentiation on Group Productivity, Efficiency, and Risk TakingAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1968
- Effects of company rank on LGD performance of oil refinery supervisors.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1953
- Overcoming Resistance to ChangeHuman Relations, 1948