Asthma economics: focusing on therapies that improve costly outcomes
- 1 January 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
- Vol. 11 (1) , 43-50
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcp.0000146782.11092.d6
Abstract
In 1998, the economic burden of asthma was estimated to be 12.7 billion dollars. Subsequent research has focused on identifying important outcomes that reflect high resource utilization and finding therapies that improve these outcomes and decrease cost. Recent developments include an update to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines, new treatment strategies using combination therapy, and the development of a monoclonal antibody therapy for asthma. Two important costly outcomes are asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Asthma-related hospitalizations started to decline in the 1990s, primarily in white Americans, but not in young African Americans. Many hospitalizations and emergency department visits are preventable, and costs were lowered by shifting management to the ambulatory care setting. Increased asthma severity and suboptimal compliance with NHLBI asthma care guidelines can contribute to the persistence of symptoms, which triggers behaviors that increase resource utilization. A recent economic analysis was one of the first well-controlled clinical trials to show that inhaled corticosteroids provide clinical benefit at modest costs. Combination therapy, particularly that containing an inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting bronchodilator in a single inhaler, potentially can reduce overall costs by improving compliance with inhaled corticosteroids. Nonpharmacologic therapies also have been shown to be cost-effective. However, a significant number of patients with asthma continue to have symptoms even while on recommended controller therapy. Omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody treatment that binds IgE, was released in the summer of 2003. Many costly asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits are preventable, and chronic disease care can be shifted to the ambulatory setting. Increased asthma severity and noncompliance with NHLBI guidelines are associated with increased resource utilization. Combination therapies can assist in improving patient compliance, and omalizumab potentially offers a novel but expensive way to decrease symptoms and resource utilization.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- Inhaled anti-inflammatory pharmacotherapy and subsequent hospitalizations and emergency department visits among patients with asthma in the Texas Medicaid programAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2004
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of early intervention with budesonide in mild persistent asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2003
- Resource costs for asthma-related care among pediatric patients in managed careAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2003
- “Real-world” effectiveness of daily controller medicine in children with mild persistent asthmaAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2003
- The impact of a large-scale population-based asthma management program on pediatric asthma patients and their caregiversAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2003
- Factors associated with emergency department use in asthma: acute care interventions improving chronic disease outcomesAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2003
- Health care costs of allergic rhinitis-associated conditions vary with allergy seasonAnnals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology, 2002
- Omalizumab, anti-IgE recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of severe allergic asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2001
- Trends in the cost of illness for asthma in the United States, 1985-1994Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2000
- Patient Noncompliance With Medical Advice After the Emergency Department VisitAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1996