Normative Ethics in Planning
- 1 November 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Planning Literature
- Vol. 5 (2) , 123-150
- https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229000500201
Abstract
Normative ethics provide guidelines for deciding what makes right acts right. Planners who have written explicitly about ethics have taken a wide variety of approaches-descriptive, analytical, and normative. Normative approaches in planning have been shaped by the dispute in philosophy between two major approaches to ethics. Utilitarianism focuses on the goodness of consequences in deciding what is right. Deontological approaches focus on rules, rights, and actions that are right in themselves. Because neither of these approaches is fully satisfactory by itself; others have been developed that attempt to deal with particular weaknesses. Rule-utilitarianism and intuitionism are discussed here. Either could be thought of as the approach that underlies professional codes of ethics.Keywords
This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit:
- APA's Ethical Principles Include Simplistic Planning TheoriesJournal of the American Planning Association, 1988
- Hierarchy, Virtue, and the Practice of Public Administration: A Perspective for Normative EthicsPublic Administration Review, 1987
- Beyond Efficiency: The Logical Underpinnings of Administrative PrinciplesPublic Administration Review, 1984
- Moral Theory and ApplicationSocial Theory and Practice, 1984
- Failures of DiscourseBulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 1976
- A Defense of the Kantian InterpretationEthics, 1976
- Rawls’ KantianismSocial Theory and Practice, 1974
- Social Equity, Justice, and the Equitable AdministratorPublic Administration Review, 1974
- Utilitarian Ethics and Social ChangeEthics, 1968
- The Anatomy of Market FailureThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1958