Cardiac natriuretic peptides for diagnosis and risk stratification in heart failure: influences of left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease on cardiac hormonal activation
- 1 August 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in European Journal of Clinical Investigation
- Vol. 28 (8) , 636-642
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2362.1998.00338.x
Abstract
Background: Cardiac natriuretic peptides are activated in heart failure. However, their diagnostic and prognostic values have not been compared under the routine conditions of an outpatient practice.Methods: We studied the diagnostic and prognostic value of plasma N‐ and C‐terminal peptides of the atrial natriuretic factor prohormone (N‐proANF and ANF respectively) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) to evaluate the severity of congestive heart failure (CHF) as reflected by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and to predict its 2‐year mortality. Peripheral plasma concentrations of the three natriuretic peptides were measured in 27 normal subjects (CTR), in 32 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and normal left ventricular ejection fraction and in 101 patients with chronic CHF in functional classes I and II (n = 61) or III and IV (n = 40).Results: Plasma concentrations of the three peptides increased in the presence of CHF in relation to its severity (P < 0.01). BNP was unable to distinguish CTR from CAD, just as ANF could not differentiate CAD from CHF I–II; only N‐proANF displayed a significant and continuous increase from CTR to CAD, CHF I–II and III–IV. Receiver‐operating characteristic curves showed better evaluation of the degree of CHF by BNP than by ANF or ejection fraction (P < 0.05). Assessment of the 2‐year prognosis revealed that N‐proANF and BNP were the best independent predictors of outcome after the NYHA classification. These peptides identify a very high‐mortality group.Conclusion: Plasma N‐proANF and BNP concentrations are good indicators of the severity and prognosis of CHF in an outpatient practice. CAD does not stimulate BNP as long as ventricular dysfunction is not present, although increased N‐proANF levels in this setting suggest an early humoral activation.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plasma Brain Natriuretic Peptide as an Indicator of Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Long-term Survival After Acute Myocardial InfarctionCirculation, 1996
- New Insights Into the Cardiac Natriuretic PeptidesCirculation, 1996
- Comparison of atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, and N-terminal proatrial natriuretic peptide as indicators of left ventricular systolic dysfunctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Neurohumoral measurements as indicators of bong-terns prognosis after acute myocardial infarctionThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1995
- N-terminal proatrial natriuretic factor. An independent predictor of long-term prognosis after myocardial infarction.Circulation, 1994
- Circulating N-terminal atrial natriuretic peptide as a marker for symptomless left-ventricular dysfunctionThe Lancet, 1993
- Plasma atrial natriuretic peptide is unstable under most storage conditions.Circulation, 1992
- Hormones regulating cardiovascular function in patients with severe congestive heart failure and their relation to mortality. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group.Circulation, 1990
- Comparison of neuroendocrine activation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction with and without congestive heart failure. A substudy of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD).Circulation, 1990
- The plasma release of atrial natriuretic peptide in manClinical Science, 1986