A History of Research on Warfare in Anthropology
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in American Anthropologist
- Vol. 101 (4) , 794-805
- https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1999.101.4.794
Abstract
In this brief history of warfare research, I identify four major periods: Foundation Period, Classical Period, Golden Age, and Recent Period. The myth of the peaceful savage arose in the Classical Period rather than in the later periods, as argued by Lawrence Keeley. The myth has its origins in an early evolutionary approach as well as in cultural relativism. It continues to play a major role in warfare research with some anthropologists arguing for the peaceable nature of man, while others argue that man has engaged in warfare from the beginning of prehistory, [war, theories of warfare, history of warfare research, myth of peaceful savage]Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- War before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful SavageAmerican Anthropologist, 1997
- The origins of warCritical Review, 1997
- Ultrasocial DarwinismScience News, 1995
- Bad Day at Bukit PekanAmerican Anthropologist, 1995
- Band-Level Eden: A Mystifying ChimeraCultural Anthropology, 1988
- General/Theoretical Anthropology: The Principles of Social Evolution. C. R. HallpikeAmerican Anthropologist, 1988
- Murder in Good CompanyScience News, 1988
- Ethnographer Bias in Cross-Cultural Research: An Empirical StudyBehavior Science Notes, 1973
- Functionalist Interpretations of Primitive WarfareMan, 1973
- Warfare, Military Organization, and the Evolution of SocietyAnthropologica, 1961