Interpretations and Treatment Decisions Based on MR Angiography versus Conventional Arteriography in Symptomatic Lower Extremity Ischemia
- 31 July 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
- Vol. 6 (4) , 595-603
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s1051-0443(95)71143-5
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- MR angiography of normal pelvic arteries: comparison of signal intensity and contrast-to-noise ratio for three different inflow techniques.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- MR angiography of the pelvis with variable velocity encoding and a phased-array coil.Radiology, 1994
- Femoral MR angiography versus conventional angiography: preliminary results.Radiology, 1993
- Atherosclerotic occlusive disease of the lower extremity: prospective evaluation with two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.Radiology, 1993
- Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease: selection of imaging parameters and clinical evaluation with MR angiography.Radiology, 1993
- MR angiography versus conventional X-ray angiography in the lower extremities: everyone wins.Radiology, 1993
- Magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral runoff vesselsJournal of Vascular Surgery, 1992
- Magnetic Resonance Angiography of the Pelvis and Lower Extremities: Works in ProgressInvestigative Radiology, 1992
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Angiographically Occult Runoff Vessels in Peripheral Arterial Occlusive DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992
- Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of MR angiography and color duplex US with conventional angiography.Radiology, 1991