Questionnaires in clinical trials: guidelines for optimal design and administration
Open Access
- 11 January 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 11 (1) , 2
- https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-11-2
Abstract
A good questionnaire design for a clinical trial will minimise bias and maximise precision in the estimates of treatment effect within budget. Attempts to collect more data than will be analysed may risk reducing recruitment (reducing power) and increasing losses to follow-up (possibly introducing bias). The mode of administration can also impact on the cost, quality and completeness of data collected. There is good evidence for design features that improve data completeness but further research is required to evaluate strategies in clinical trials. Theory-based guidelines for style, appearance, and layout of self-administered questionnaires have been proposed but require evaluation.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnairesCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2009
- Does a monetary incentive improve the response to a postal questionnaire in a randomised controlled trial? The MINT incentive studyTrials, 2009
- Mode Differences Between Face-to-Face and Web Surveys: An Experimental Investigation of Data Quality and Social Desirability EffectsInternational Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2009
- Randomized Trial of Questionnaire LengthEpidemiology, 2009
- Response and non‐response to postal questionnaire follow‐up in a clinical trial – a qualitative study of the patient’s perspectiveJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2007
- Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey QuestionsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2004
- The Concordance of Self-Report With Other Measures of Medication AdherenceMedical Care, 2004
- Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methodsBMJ, 2001
- Optimizing Power in Allocating Resources to Exposure Assessment in an Epidemiologic StudyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Simplification of Flesch Reading Ease Formula.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1951