Motion Aftereffect: A Global Mechanism for the Perception of Rotation
- 1 April 1980
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perception
- Vol. 9 (2) , 175-182
- https://doi.org/10.1068/p090175
Abstract
Observers adapted to motion by looking at rotating logarithmic spirals. They were tested with a stationary mirror image of the adapting spiral in which all contours were at 90° to those of the first spiral. Motion aftereffects were reported in the contrarotational direction—that is, observers who had seen clockwise rotating motion reported seeing counterclockwise aftereffects. These aftereffects lasted one-third as long as the aftereffects obtained when the adapting spiral was used as the test figure. These two aftereffects were shown to have different storage properties, thereby indexing the operation of at least two different mechanisms. We interpret the motion aftereffect that is obtained with the mirror-image stimulus as indicative of the existence of global rotation detectors.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: Different neural mechanisms?Vision Research, 1979
- Neurons in area 18 of cat visual cortex selectively sensitive to changing size: Nonlinear interactions between responses to two edgesVision Research, 1979
- Motion aftereffects: Evidence for parallel processing in motion perceptionVision Research, 1976
- Variations of the Visual Responses of the Superior Colliculus in Relation to Body RollScience, 1972
- Reversibility of perceived motion: Selective adaptation of the human visual system to speed, size and orientationVision Research, 1972
- The orientation specificity of two visual after‐effectsThe Journal of Physiology, 1971
- Motion Detection in Man and other AnimalsBrain, Behavior and Evolution, 1971
- Visual Motion Perception: Experimental ModificationScience, 1969
- Orientational selectivity of the human visual systemThe Journal of Physiology, 1966
- Figural After-Effects and Apparent SizeQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1961