Strategic, symmetrical public relations in government: From pluralism to societal corporatism
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Communication Management
- Vol. 3 (3) , 218-234
- https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026049
Abstract
Public relations professionals frequently maintain that public relations is different in governmental organisations than in corporations, associations and not‐for‐profit organisations. Textbooks commonly include separate chapters on government public relations; and some universities in the USA teach separate courses on government communication programmes. Most public relations theorists, however, have not constructed separate theories of public relations for government. In this paper, the authors theorise that the principles of public relations for government are the same as for other types of organisation, but that the specific conditions to which the principles must be applied are different. Research has shown, however, that governmental organisations are more likely than other organisations to practice a public information model of public relations and less likely to engage in two‐way communication. The authors suggest theoretically that governmental organisations, especially in the USA, are more likely to practice one‐way, information‐based communication programmes because of a pluralistic view of government. In countries where government is based more on a societal corporatist view, organisations are more likely to practice strategic, two‐way communication. This paper analyses the information policies of Canada and Norway as examples. It concludes with the proposition that strategic, symmetrical public relations requires an agency to view its relationship with publics from a societal corporatist perspective rather than from a pluralistic perspective.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are the IABC's excellence principles generic? Comparing Slovenia and the United States, the United Kingdom and CanadaJournal of Communication Management, 1998
- Improving Risk Communication in Government: Research PrioritiesRisk Analysis, 1995
- Integrating blueprint and process: A structured flexibility approach to development managementPublic Administration and Development, 1989