Motivation and Organizational Principles for Anatomical Knowledge Representation: The Digital Anatomist Symbolic Knowledge Base
Open Access
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 5 (1) , 17-40
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.1998.0050017
Abstract
Objective: Conceptualization of the physical objects and spaces that constitute the human body at the macroscopic level of organization, specified as a machine-parseable ontology that, in its human-readable form, is comprehensible to both expert and novice users of anatomical information. Design: Conceived as an anatomical enhancement of the UMLS Semantic Network and Metathesaurus, the anatomical ontology was formulated by specifying defining attributes and differentia for classes and subclasses of physical anatomical entities based on their partitive and spatial relationships. The validity of the classification was assessed by instantiating the ontology for the thorax. Several transitive relationships were used for symbolically modeling aspects of the physical organization of the thorax. Results: By declaring Organ as the macroscopic organizational unit of the body, and defining the entities that constitute organs and higher level entities constituted by organs, all anatomical entities could be assigned to one of three top level classes (Anatomical structure, Anatomical spatial entity and Body substance). The ontology accommodates both the systemic and regional (topographical) views of anatomy, as well as diverse clinical naming conventions of anatomical entities. Conclusions: The ontology formulated for the thorax is extendible to microscopic and cellular levels, as well as to other body parts, in that its classes subsume essentially all anatomical entities that constitute the body. Explicit definitions of these entities and their relationships provide the first requirement for standards in anatomical concept representation. Conceived from an anatomical viewpoint, the ontology can be generalized and mapped to other biomedical domains and problem solving tasks that require anatomical knowledge.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Symbolic Anatomic Knowledge Representation in the Read Codes Version 3: Structure and ApplicationJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1997
- The Visible Human Male: A Technical ReportJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1996
- The potential of computerized representations of anatomy in the training of health care providersAcademic Medicine, 1995
- A Logical Foundation for Representation of Clinical DataJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- Toward a Medical-concept Representation LanguageJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1994
- A translation approach to portable ontology specificationsKnowledge Acquisition, 1993
- Approaches to the construction of a medical informatics glossary and thesaurusMedical Informatics, 1993
- Dimensions of knowledge sharing and reuseComputers and Biomedical Research, 1992
- Utilizing detailed anatomical knowledge for hypothesis formation and hypothesis testing in rheumatological decision supportArtificial Intelligence in Medicine, 1991
- Medicine and the Nature of Vertical ReasoningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988