Minimizing respondent attrition in longitudinal research: Practical implications from a cohort study of adolescent drinking☆
- 22 May 2003
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Adolescence
- Vol. 26 (3) , 363-373
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-1971(03)00011-3
Abstract
The methods used to maximize retention in a longitudinal study of adolescent drinking are discussed. Data were collected at three time points: at recruitment to the study, after nine months and at 18 months. Strategies to minimize attrition included the collection of detailed contact information, incentives for participation, postcard and telephone reminders and telephone interviews. Ninety-six percent of the original sample completed the first follow-up questionnaire, 92% completed the second and the study lost contact with just 3% of participants. The success of the current project is notable as this type of population is notoriously difficult to retain in longitudinal studies.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Drug use functions predict cocaine-related problems in young peopleDrug and Alcohol Review, 2000
- Impact of illicit substance activity on young peopleJournal of Substance Misuse, 1997
- Factors Affecting Attrition in a Longitudinal Smoking Prevention StudyPreventive Medicine, 1996
- Panel attrition and external validity in adolescent substance use research.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1992
- Panel Attrition and External Validity in the Short-Term Follow-Up Study of Adolescent Substance UseEvaluation Review, 1992
- A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: One-year follow-upAddictive Behaviors, 1990
- Tracking and attrition in longitudinal school-based smoking prevention researchPreventive Medicine, 1989
- Containing Attrition in School-Based ResearchEvaluation Review, 1988
- Attrition in prevention researchJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 1985
- Impact of Attrition in a Sample in a Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Drug UsePsychological Reports, 1983