Willingness to Answer Multiple-Choice Questions as Manifested Both in Genuine and in Nonsense Items
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 42 (3) , 815-821
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448204200314
Abstract
A formal description of partial knowledge, ability, and willingness to answer multiple-choice items put forward by Hutchinson (1977, 1980) makes predictions about response behavior on items for which none of the stated alternatives is correct. Cross and Frary (1977) obtained data on subjects' responses under these conditions. Hutchinson's theory is shown to account for a moderate proportion of the variation between subjects in the number of nonsense items they respond to. Alternative versions of the theory were compared, and one which implies the existence of partial knowledge was found to be better than one which implies that an appropriate measure of ability is obtained by applying the conventional "correction for guessing."Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Partial knowledge and the theoretical basis of linear corrections for guessingContemporary Educational Psychology, 1980
- The Effect of Misinformation, Partial Information, and Guessing on Expected Multiple-Choice Test Item ScoresApplied Psychological Measurement, 1980
- AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF LORD'S THEORETICAL RESULTS REGARDING FORMULA SCORING OF MULTIPLE-CHOICE TESTSJournal of Educational Measurement, 1977
- On the relevance of signal detection theory to the correction for guessingContemporary Educational Psychology, 1977
- A Measure of the Gambling Response-Set in Objective TestsPsychometrika, 1957