Lecture, Discussion, and Independent Study Instructional Methods Revisited
- 1 June 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Experimental Education
- Vol. 40 (4) , 24-28
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1972.11011346
Abstract
This study compares the effect of three teaching methods on recall of facts, understanding of content, and application of principles. College students were taught using fictitous material as part of the course content. Scores on a criterion examination were compared through a 1-way analysis of covariance using grade point average as a predictor. The differences among the three methods were not significant on subtests for recall, under standing, and application. However, with better controls and a less questionable sampling procedure it is possible that differences could be found. There was support that face to face teaching does have advantages even though the form is not important.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analysis of Covariance: A Delicate InstrumentAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1969
- The contribution of the lecture to college teaching.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1960
- The effects of different teaching methods: A methodological study.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1958
- The teaching of psychology: a survey of research since 1942.Psychological Bulletin, 1955
- Nondirective teaching in psychology: An experimental study.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 1951
- A psychotherapeutic method of teaching psychology.American Psychologist, 1949
- Analysis of some factors conditioning learning in general psychology.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1932