Sympathetic Nervous System Does Not Mediate Reflex Pupillary Dilation during Desflurane Anesthesia
Open Access
- 1 October 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesiology
- Vol. 85 (4) , 748-754
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199610000-00009
Abstract
Background: Pupil size is determined by an interaction between the sympathetic and parasympathetic divisions of the autonomic nervous system. Noxious stimulation dilates the pupil in both unanesthetized and anesthetized humans. In the absence of anesthesia, dilation is primarily mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. In contrast, pupillary dilation in cats given barbiturate or cloralose anesthesia is mediated solely by inhibition of the midbrain parasympathetic nucleus. The mechanism by which noxious stimuli dilate pupils during anesthesia in humans remains unknown. Accordingly, the authors tested the hypothesis that the pupillary dilation in response to noxious stimulation during desflurane anesthesia is primarily a parasympathetic reflex. Methods: In six volunteers, the alpha-I adrenergic receptors of the iris musculature were blocked by unilateral administration of topical dapiprazole; six other volunteers were given unilateral topical tropicamide to block the muscarinic receptors in the iris. Desflurane anesthesia was subsequently induced in all volunteers. Sympathetic nervous system activation, with reflex dilation of the pupil, was produced by noxious electrical stimulation during 4% and 8% end-tidal desflurane, and by a rapid 4%-to-8% step-up in the desflurane concentration. Pupil diameter and the change in pupil size induced by a light stimulus (light reflex amplitude) were measured with infrared pupillometry. Results: Dapiprazole drops produced a Horner's miosis, but pupils were equally small after induction of anesthesia. Pupillary dilation after noxious stimulation and desflurane step-up was identical in the unblocked and dapiprazole-blocked pupils. After tropicamide administration, the pupil was dilated and the light reflex was completely inhibited. Noxious stimulation nonetheless produced a slight additional dilation. Conclusions: During desflurane anesthesia, pupillary dilation in response to noxious stimulation or desflurane step-up is not mediated by the sympathetic nervous system (as it is in unanesthetized persons). Although inhibition of the pupillo-constrictor nucleus may be the cause of this dilation, the mechanism remains unknown.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fentanyl, Clonidine, and Repeated Increases in Desflurane Concentration, but Not Nitrous Oxide or Esmolol, Block the Transient Mydriasis Caused by Rapid Increases in Desflurane ConcentrationAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1995
- Pupillometric Analysis of the 'Absent Light Reflex'Archives of Neurology, 1995
- Pupillary Assessment of Sensory Block Level during Combined Epidural/General AnesthesiaAnesthesiology, 1993
- Pupillary Response to Noxious Stimulation During Isoflurane and Propofol AnesthesiaAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1993
- High Thoracic Segmental Epidural Anesthesia Diminishes Sympathetic Outflow to the Legs, Despite Restriction of Sensory Blockade to the Upper ThoraxAnesthesiology, 1990
- The ciliospinal response in manNeurology, 1969
- Mydriatic Effect of Four Drugs Determined With PupillographArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1967
- Mechanisms of reflex dilatation of the pupilDocumenta Ophthalmologica, 1958
- THE CILIOSPINAL REFLEX IN INJURIES OF THE CERVICAL SPINAL CORD IN MANArchives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 1953
- ROLE OF SYMPATHETIC AND PARASYMPATHETIC SYSTEMS IN REFLEX DILATATION OF THE PUPILArchives of Neurology & Psychiatry, 1950