Description and demonstration of the EXPOLIS simulation model: Two examples of modeling population exposure to particulate matter
Open Access
- 28 February 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology
- Vol. 13 (2) , 87-99
- https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500258
Abstract
As a part of the EXPOLIS study, a stochastic exposure-modeling framework was developed. The framework is useful to compare exposure distributions of different (sub-) populations or different scenarios, and to gain insight into population exposure distributions and exposure determinants. It was implemented in an MS-Excel workbook using @Risk add-on software. Basic concept of the framework is that time-weighted average exposure is a sum of partial exposures in the visited microenvironments. Partial exposure is determined by the concentration and the time spent in the microenvironment. In the absence of data, indoor concentrations are derived as a function of ambient concentrations, effective penetration rates and contribution of indoor sources. Framework input parameters are described by probability distributions. A lognormal distribution is assumed for the microenvironment concentrations and for the contribution of indoor sources, and a beta distribution for the time spent in a microenvironment and for the penetration factor. Mean and standard deviation values parameterize the distributions. In this paper, Latin Hypercube sampling is used for the input distributions. The outcome of the framework is an estimate of the population exposure distribution for the selected air pollutant. The framework is best suited for averaging times from 24 h upwards. Sensitivity analyses can be performed to determine the most influential factors of exposure. The application of the framework is illustrated in two examples. The EXPOLIS PM2.5 example uses microenvironment measurement and time–activity data from the EXPOLIS study to model PM2.5 population exposure distributions in four European cities. The results are compared to the observed personal exposure distributions from the same study. The Dutch PM10 example uses input data from several (Dutch) databases and from literature, and shows a more complex application of the framework for comparison of scenarios and subpopulations.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six U.S. cities.Environmental Health Perspectives, 2000
- Short-Term Effects of Air Pollution on Hospital Admissions of Respiratory Diseases in Europe: A Quantitative Summary of APHEA Study ResultsArchives of environmental health, 1998
- Indoor-outdoor air pollution relations: particulate matter less than 10 μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM10) in homes of asthmaticsAtmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics, 1992
- Validation of the simulation of human activity and pollutant exposure (SHAPE) model using paired days from the Denver, CO, carbon monoxide field studyAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1988
- Estimating personal exposures to NO2Environment International, 1986
- Total human exposureEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1985
- Personal exposures to respirable particulates and implications for air pollution epidemiologyEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1985
- Personal exposure to respirable particles: A case study in Waterbury, VermontAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1984
- Exposure Estimates Based on Computer Generated Activity PatternsJournal of Toxicology: Clinical Toxicology, 1983
- Indoor-outdoor relationships of respirable sulfates and particlesAtmospheric Environment (1967), 1981