Reasons for Escalating Pacemaker Implants
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 98 (1) , 93-97
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.069
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations in the United StatesJAMA, 2004
- The World Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Cardioverter Defibrillators: Calendar Year 2001Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2004
- The expanding national burden of heart failure in the United States: the influence of heart failure in womenAmerican Heart Journal, 2003
- Have the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials of Pacing Altered the Practice of Cardiac Pacing?Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2003
- ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices—Summary ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 2002
- Ventricular Pacing or Dual-Chamber Pacing for Sinus-Node DysfunctionNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Survey of Cardiac Pacing and Implanted Defibrillator Practice Patterns in the United States in 1997Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2001
- Effects of Physiologic Pacing versus Ventricular Pacing on the Risk of Stroke and Death Due to Cardiovascular CausesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2000
- Bias in the Coding of Hospital Discharge Data and Its Implications for Quality AssessmentMedical Care, 1994
- Guidelines for implantation of cardiac pacemakers and antiarrhythmia devices. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures. (Committee on Pacemaker Implantation).Circulation, 1991