A prospective, observational study of a chest pain observation unit in a British hospital
Open Access
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Emergency Medicine Journal
- Vol. 19 (2) , 117-121
- https://doi.org/10.1136/emj.19.2.117
Abstract
Objectives: To establish a chest pain observation unit, monitor its performance in terms of appropriate discharge after assessment, and estimate the cost per patient. Methods: Prospective, observational, cohort study of patients attending a large, city, teaching hospital accident and emergency department between 1 March 1999 and 29 February 2000 with acute undifferentiated chest pain. Patients were managed on a chest pain observation unit, entailing two to six hours of observation, serial electrocardiograph recording, cardiac enzyme measurement, and, where appropriate, exercise stress test. Patients were discharged home if all tests were negative and admitted to hospital if tests were positive or equivocal. The following outcomes were measured—proportion of participants discharged after assessment; clinical status three days after discharge; cardiac events and procedures during the following six months; and cost of assessment and admission. Results: Twenty three participants (4.3%) had a final diagnosis of myocardial infarction. All were detected and admitted to hospital. A total of 461 patients (86.3%) were discharged after assessment, 357 (66.9%) avoided hospital admission entirely. At review three days later these patients had no new ECG changes and only one raised troponin T measurement. In the six months after assessment, three cardiac deaths, two myocardial infarctions, and two revascularisation procedures were recorded among those discharged. The mean cost of assessment and hospital admission was £221 per patient, or £323 if subsequent interventional cardiology costs were included. Conclusions: The chest pain observation unit is a practical alternative to routine care for acute chest pain in the United Kingdom. Negative assessment effectively rules out immediate, serious morbidity, but not longer term morbidity and mortality. Costs seem to be similar to routine care.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is a chest pain observation unit likely to be cost saving in a British hospital?Emergency Medicine Journal, 2001
- Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting With Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction or Unstable Angina☆Annals of Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Prediction of short- and long-term outcomes by troponin t levels in low-risk patients evaluated for acute coronary syndromesAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2000
- Should we establish chest pain observation units in the UK? A systematic review and critical appraisal of the literatureEmergency Medicine Journal, 2000
- ConferenceJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1997
- Emergency cardiac stress testing in the evaluation of emergency department patients with atypical chest painAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Acute myocardial infarction in chest pain patients with nondiagnostic ECGs: Serial CK-MB sampling in the emergency departmentAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- International diagnostic criteria for acute myocardial infarction and acute strokeAmerican Heart Journal, 1984
- A Predictive Instrument to Improve Coronary-Care-Unit Admission Practices in Acute Ischemic Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984