DETECTION OF WEST NILE VIRUS IN LARGE POOLS OF MOSQUITOES
- 1 December 2007
- journal article
- Published by American Mosquito Control Association in Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association
- Vol. 23 (4) , 389-395
- https://doi.org/10.2987/5630.1
Abstract
We conducted a laboratory evaluation of the ability of commercial antigen-capture assays, the Rapid Analyte Measurement Platform (RAMP) and the VecTest wicking assay, as well as Real Time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR, Taqman) and Vero cell plaque assay to detect West Nile virus (WNV) in large mosquito pools. Real-Time PCR (Taqman) was the most sensitive, detecting WNV ribonucleic acid (RNA) in 100% of samples containing a single infected mosquito in pool sizes of up to 500 mosquitoes. Mosquito body tissues minimally impacted the ability of Real Time RT-PCR to detect WNV in a pool size of 500, reducing sensitivity by 0.6 log10 plaque-forming units (PFU)/ml. Vero cell plaque assay detected live virus from a single infected mosquito in 100% of pools containing up to 200 mosquitoes, but was unreliable at larger pool sizes. VecTest detected 100% of positive pools containing 50 mosquitoes with 5.8 log10 PFU/ml virus, 100 mosquitoes with 5.9 log10 PFU/ml, and 200 mosquitoes with 5.2 log10 PFU/ ml. The RAMP assay detected 100% of positive pools containing 50 mosquitoes with 3.3 log10 PFU/ml virus, 100 mosquitoes with 3.7 log10 PFU/ml, and 200 mosquitoes with 4.0 log10 PFU/ml. Results indicate that WNV can be reliably detected by all 4 assays in pools of mosquitoes exceeding 50 specimens, though there is some loss of sensitivity with very large pool sizes.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- IMPORTANT EXPERIMENTAL PARAMETERS FOR DETERMINING INFECTION RATES IN ARTHROPOD VECTORS USING POOL SCREENING APPROACHESThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2006
- EVALUATION OF COMMERCIAL ASSAYS FOR DETECTING WEST NILE VIRUS ANTIGENJournal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2006
- A COMPARISON OF TWO WEST NILE VIRUS DETECTION ASSAYS (TAQMAN REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION AND VECTEST ANTIGEN ASSAY) DURING THREE CONSECUTIVE OUTBREAKS IN NORTHERN ILLINOISJournal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 2006
- Epidemiology of West Nile Virus in Connecticut: A Five-Year Analysis of Mosquito Data 1999–2003Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 2004
- SHORT REPORT: DETECTION PROBABILITY OF ARBOVIRUS INFECTION IN MOSQUITO POPULATIONSThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2004
- Blinded Laboratory Comparison of the In Situ Enzyme Immunoassay, the VecTest Wicking Assay, and a Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay to Detect Mosquitoes Infected with West Nile and St. Louis Encephalitis VirusesJournal of Medical Entomology, 2004
- Virus Detection Protocols for West Nile Virus in Vertebrate and Mosquito SpecimensJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2003
- Wicking Assays for the Rapid Detection of West Nile and St. Louis Encephalitis Viral Antigens in Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)Journal of Medical Entomology, 2003
- Detection of West Nile Virus Antigen in Mosquitoes and Avian Tissues by a Monoclonal Antibody-Based Capture Enzyme ImmunoassayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2002
- Vector Surveillance for West Nile VirusAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2001