ORIGINAL ARTICLES: USAGE OF STATISTICS IN THE SURGICAL LITERATURE AND THE ‘ORPHAN P’ PHENOMENON
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Anz Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 59 (6) , 449-451
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb01609.x
Abstract
The statistics used in 240 surgical publications were reviewed. Basic parametric statistics were used in 60% of the publications; 21% of publications failed to document a measure of central tendency, 11% of publications contained an undefined notation, and 10% of publications did not state the type of evaluative statistic that was used to calculate a p value, that is, an ‘orphan p’. These results indicate the need for wider education about the use of descriptive and basic parametric statistics. It is impossible to evaluate the surgical literature critically without these skills.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistics and the Practicing PhysicianMayo Clinic Proceedings, 1988
- The task of a statistical refereeBritish Journal of Surgery, 1988
- Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical JournalsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1988
- X̃ and iprp: An improved summary for scientific communicationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- PRESENTING STATISTICSAnz Journal of Surgery, 1987
- Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies.BMJ, 1986
- Statistical guidelines for contributors to medical journals.BMJ, 1983
- MISUSE OF STATISTICAL METHODS IN THE AUSTRALASIAN SURGICAL LITERATUREAnz Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Use of the t test in the British Journal of SurgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982
- Six statistical suggestions for surgeonsNeurosurgery, 1981