Visual landmark learning
- 7 November 2002
- proceedings article
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- Vol. 1, 227-232
- https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2000.894609
Abstract
Biology often offers valuable example of systems both for learning and for controlling motion. Work in ro- botics has often been inspired by these findings in di- verse ways. Though, the fundamental aspects that in- volve visual landmark learning and motion control mech- anisms have almost exclusively been approached heuris- tically rather than examining the underlying princi- ples. In this paper we introduce theoretical tools that might explain how the visual learning works and why the motion is attracted by the pre-learnt goal position. Basically, the theoretical tools emerge from the nav- igation vector field produced by the visual behaviors. Both the learning process and the navigation scheme influence the motion field. We apply classical mathe- matical and dynamic control to analyze the efficiency of our method.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dealing with robustness in mobile robot guidance while operating with visual strategiesPublished by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) ,2002
- The turn-back-and-look behaviour: bee versus robotBiological Cybernetics, 2000
- BIOLOGICALLY BASED ARTIFICIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS: REVIEW AND PROSPECTSProgress in Neurobiology, 1997
- Honeybees’ visual spatial orientation at the feeding sitePublished by Springer Nature ,1997
- Approaching and departing bees learn different cues to the distance of a landmarkJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1994
- Why do bees turn back and look?Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 1993
- Landmark learning and guidance in insectsPhilosophical Transactions Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1992
- ArthropodsPublished by Springer Nature ,1992
- Bees which turn back and lookThe Science of Nature, 1991
- Landmark learning in beesJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1983