Effects of captopril and enalapril on renal function in elderly patients with chronic heart failure
- 1 May 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Vol. 71 (835) , 287-292
- https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.71.835.287
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects on renal function of captopril and enalapril in elderly patients with chronic heart failure. DESIGN: A multi-centre double-blind parallel-group comparison of the two angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, captopril (12.5 mg bid) and enalapril (2.5 mg bid). SUBJECTS: 80 elderly patients with chronic heart failure (41 in the captopril group, 39 in the enalapril group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The blood pressure and pulse rate response to the first dose of ACE inhibitor was assessed in all patients. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was measured radioisotopically by 99mTcDTPA or 51CrEDTA clearance after three and six months of each treatment. Subgroups were assessed for effective renal plasma flow (33 patients), exercise tolerance (25 patients) and by a symptom-oriented questionnaire (45 patients). RESULTS: No serious adverse effect on GFR was noticed. There was no significant difference between the two treatments in the mean baseline GFR or in changes from baseline at three and six months (captopril mean baseline GFR 49.6 ml min-1 1.76 m-2, enalapril 54.7 ml min-1 1.76 m-2; mean change (95% confidence interval) at three months captopril 12 ml min-1 (+3.0, +21.0), enalapril -2 ml min-1 (-13.0; +9.0); mean change at six months, captopril 3.7 ml min-1 (-6.7; +14.2), enalapril -6.0 ml min-1 (-21.0; +9.4). Significantly more patients given captopril had an improvement in GFR during the study period (26/31 compared with 20/31 enalapril-treated patients at three months, p = 0.0096, and 23/30 compared with 15/27 at six months, p = 0.021). There were no significant changes in effective renal plasma flow. Three patients treated with enalapril developed symptomatic hypotension within three days of starting treatment. Quality of life questionnaires revealed more gastrointestinal symptoms in the enalapril group (p = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: Captopril seems marginally preferable to enalapril in the treatment of chronic heart failure in elderly patients.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- The clinical pharmacology of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in chronic heart failurePharmacology & Therapeutics, 1992
- Differences in first dose response to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in congestive heart failure: a placebo controlled study.Heart, 1991
- Enalapril in the Treatment of Congestive Heart FailureJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1990
- Short- and long-acting angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: A randomized trial of lisinopril versus captopril in the treatment of congestive heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1989
- Lisinopril and captopril in the treatment of heart failure in older patientsThe American Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Identification of hyponatremia as a risk factor for the development of functional renal insufficiency during converting enzyme inhibition in severe chronic heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1987
- Comparison of Captopril and Enalapril in Patients with Severe Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Captopril in elderly patients with heart failure.BMJ, 1986
- Captopril in heart failure. A double blind controlled trial.Heart, 1984
- A placebo-controlled trial of captopril in refractory chronic congestive heart failureJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1983