Sampling for Plant Disease Incidence
Open Access
- 1 November 1999
- journal article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Phytopathology®
- Vol. 89 (11) , 1088-1103
- https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto.1999.89.11.1088
Abstract
Knowledge of the distribution of diseased plant units (such as leaves, plants, or roots) or of the relationship between the variance and mean incidence is essential to efficiently sample for diseased plant units. Cluster sampling, consisting of N sampling units of n individuals each, is needed to determine whether the binomial or beta-binomial distribution describes the data or to estimate parameters of the binary power law for disease incidence. The precision of estimated disease incidence can then be evaluated under a wide range of settings including the hierarchical sampling of groups of individuals, the various levels of spatial heterogeneity of disease, and the situation when all individuals are disease free. Precision, quantified with the standard error or the width of the confidence interval for incidence, is directly related to N and inversely related to the degree of heterogeneity (characterized by the intracluster correlation, ρ). Based on direct estimates of ρ (determined from the θ parameter of the beta-binomial distribution or from the observed variance) or a model predicting ρ as a function of incidence (derived from the binary power law), one can calculate, before a sampling bout, the value of N needed to achieve a desired level of precision. The value of N can also be determined during a sampling bout using sequential sampling methods, either to estimate incidence with desired precision or to test a hypothesis about true disease incidence. In the latter case, the sequential probability ratio test is shown here to be useful for classifying incidence relative to a hypothesized threshold when the data follows the beta-binomial distribution with either a fixed ρ or a ρ that depends on incidence.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sampling for Decision Making in Crop Loss Assessment and Pest Management: IntroductionPhytopathology®, 1999
- Validating mathematical models of plant-disease progress in space and timeMathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA, 1997
- Plant disease incidence: inverse sampling, sequential sampling, and confidence intervals when observed mean incidence is zeroCrop Protection, 1996
- Optimum Sampling Size for Determining Different Aspects of Alternaria Blotch of Apple Caused byAlternaria maliPlant Disease, 1994
- Sequential sampling for wheat stripe rust managementCrop Protection, 1992
- Interval estimation of the marginal probability of success for the beta-binomial distributionJournal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 1990
- Sampling Procedures for Determining Severity of Alfalfa Leaf Spot DiseasesPhytopathology®, 1987
- Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical AccuracyStatistical Science, 1986
- Group Testing for Estimating Infection Rates and Probabilities of Disease TransmissionPhytopathology®, 1985
- Size and shape of sampling units for estimating incidence of stem canker on oil-seed rape stubble in field plots after swathingThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1980