Clinical evaluation of tumor targeting with the anticarcinoembryonic antigen murine monoclonal antibody fragment, MN-14 F(ab)2
Open Access
- 1 July 1996
- Vol. 78 (1) , 157-168
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<157::aid-cncr22>3.0.co;2-y
Abstract
BACKGROUND The initial clinical experience with the second‐generation, high‐affinity, MN‐14 immunoglobulin (IgG) anticarcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibody (MoAb) in patients with CEA‐producing tumors was reported previously. A bivalent fragment of this MoAb, MN‐14 F(ab)2, was prepared, and its pharmacokinetics, targeting properties, dosimetry, and immunogenicity were investigated. METHODS MN‐14 F(ab)2(0.6–29 mg) was labeled with 131I(7.7–269 millicuries and injected into 28 patients with CEA‐producing cancers. External scintigraphy was used to evaluate tumor targeting. Quantitative external scintigraphy methods were used to determine the organ and tumor radiation doses. RESULTS The overall sensitivity of tumor targeting on a lesion basis was 86%, similar to that reported previously for MN‐14 whole IgG. The biologic T1/2's for the fragment in the blood and total body (in hours) were 16.8 ± 4.1 and 59.4 ± 9.4, respectively, compared with 27.3 ± 15.7 and 69.6 ± 32.2 reported for MN‐14 IgG. Depending on the protein dose given, high plasma CEA levels (>100 ng/mL) resulted in a significant alteration of MoAb pharmacokinetics and organ dosimetry. Individual tumors received an average dose of 10.7 ± 7.3 centigray [cGy]/mCi, and the tumor‐to‐total body, red marrow, lung, liver, and kidney dose ratios were 16.8 ± 11.1, 5.6 ± 3.6, 5.1 ± 3.9, 6.0 ± 3.8, and 3.1 ± 2.0, respectively (mean + standard deviation [SD]). Only 9 of 18 patients (50%) injected with > 4 mg (range: 4–52.1 mg) of MN‐14 F(ab)2 developed significant levels of human antimouse antibodies, suggesting that the F(ab)2 may be less immunogenic than the intact IgG. CONCLUSIONS MN‐14 F(ab)2 exhibits a similar targeting sensitivity and tumor dose as reported previously for the IgG form. The lower red marrow doses combined with lower immunogenicity expected for this agent, may make it a suitable alternative for future imaging and therapeutic applications. Cancer 1996;78:157‐68.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Characterization of second-generation monoclonal antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigenCancer, 1993
- Current perspectives and challenges in the use of monoclonal antibodies as imaging and therapeutic agentsAdvanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1990
- Metastatic colorectal cancer: radioimmunoscintigraphy with a stabilized In-111-labeled F(ab')2 fragment of an anti-CEA monoclonal antibody.Radiology, 1990
- Radioimmunoscintigraphy with 111In labelled monoclonal antibody fragments (F(ab')2 BW 431/31) against CEANuclear Medicine Communications, 1989
- Comparison of therapeutic efficacy and host toxicity of two different131I-labelled antibodies and their fragments in the GW-39 colonic cancer xenograft modelInternational Journal of Cancer, 1989
- Ablation of human colon carcinoma in nude mice by 131I-labeled monoclonal anti-carcinoembryonic antigen antibody F(ab')2 fragments.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1989
- Scintigraphy with In-111-labeled monoclonal antitumor antibodies: kinetics, biodistribution, and tumor detection.Radiology, 1988
- Immunoscintigraphy of adenocarcinomas by means of 111In-labelled F(abʼ)2 fragments of anti-CEA monoclonal antibody F023C5Nuclear Medicine Communications, 1988
- Use of Radiolabeled Antibodies to Carcinoembryonic Antigen for the Detection and Localization of Diverse Cancers by External PhotoscanningNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- DEMONSTRATION OF TUMOR-SPECIFIC ANTIGENS IN HUMAN COLONIC CARCINOMATA BY IMMUNOLOGICAL TOLERANCE AND ABSORPTION TECHNIQUESThe Journal of Experimental Medicine, 1965