Risk allocation and competition in foraging groups: reversed effects of competition if group size varies under risk of predation
- 22 July 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Royal Society in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
- Vol. 271 (1547) , 1491-1496
- https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2739
Abstract
Animals often feed more quickly when in larger groups. This group–size effect is often explained by safety advantages for groups but an alternative explanation is that animals feed faster in larger groups because of greater scramble competition for limited food. We show that predation risk enhances the group–size effect if groups vary in size. By contrast, competition leads to the group–size effect only when individuals feed in groups of constant size. When individuals feed in groups that vary in size, the best strategy for dealing with competition is to feed intensely when in smaller groups and feed little when in larger (more competitive) groups. In all situations, the effects of competition interact with the effects of predation risk in a simple multiplicative way. Our results suggest that scramble competition is not a general explanation for the group–size effect on vigilance in situations where group size changes relatively rapidly.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Testing explanations of the group size effect on vigilance: let’s be directBehavioural Processes, 2003
- Changes in Vigilance with Group Size under Scramble CompetitionThe American Naturalist, 2003
- Does Feeding Competition Influence Tammar Wallaby Time Allocation?Ethology, 2002
- Should vigilance always decrease with group size?Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2001
- The effect of group size on the foraging behaviour of juvenile coho salmon: reduction of predation risk or increased competition?Animal Behaviour, 1999
- The effect of group size on mean food intake rate in birdsBiological Reviews, 1998
- Re–examining safety in numbers: interactions between risk dilution and collective detection depend upon predator targeting behaviourProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 1998
- Flocking is an effective anti-predation strategy in redshanks, Tringa totanusAnimal Behaviour, 1994
- PREDATOR VIGILANCE AND GROUP SIZE IN MAMMALS AND BIRDS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCEBiological Reviews, 1989
- On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birdsActa Biotheoretica, 1969