An empirical evaluation of an interactive multi-sensory environment for children with disability
- 1 January 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability
- Vol. 23 (4) , 267-278
- https://doi.org/10.1080/13668259800033761
Abstract
Seventeen students with severe disability (age range 5 years to 18 years) from one school were assessed on Foundation Outcome Statement Skills (FOS Skills) and subsequently exposed to an interactive multi-sensory environment (MSE). Approximately 40 hours of video recordings were made of the 17 participants interacting in the MSE, and a further recording was made during a school excursion to a local farm school to check for generalisation of behaviour. Six categories of disability were covered in the evaluation, namely children with: severe intellectual disability, severe intellectual disability/autism, severe intellectual disability/visual impairment, severe intellectual disability/hearing impairment, multiple disability, and multiple disability/visual impairment. A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed a statistically significant increase in the number of FOS Skills exhibited by the participants from Pre MSE to Post MSE. A further ANOVA demonstrated a significant increase in the number of FOS Skills immediately following exposure to the MSE (i.e., following the first session in the MSE). These increases were particularly marked for a small number of participants and for four main FOS Skills. There was also some evidence of generalisation of FOS Skills to an external setting.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multi‐sensory environments: an exploration of their potential for young people with profound and multiple learning difficultiesBritish Journal of Special Education, 1995
- How Do Clients Benefit from Snoezelen? An Exploratory StudyBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy, 1992
- Focus Group Interview: An Underutilized Research Technique for Improving Theory and Practice in Health EducationHealth Education Quarterly, 1987