Effect of imidacloprid on the reproduction of acaricide‐resistant and susceptible strains of Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)
- 22 March 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pest Management Science
- Vol. 62 (5) , 419-424
- https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1182
Abstract
Occasional reports linking neonicotinoid insecticide applications to field population outbreaks of the two‐spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, have been a topic of concern for integrated pest management (IPM) programmes, particularly in apples. In order to shed light on the factors which may contribute to the occasional field population increase of T. urticae following the application of neonicotinoid insecticides, greenhouse experiments have been set up. Four different T. urticae strains, namely GSS (acaricide‐susceptible), WI (organophosphate‐selected), USA (a largely uncharacterised strain) and Akita (METI (mitochondrial electron transport inhibitor) acaricide‐resistant and cross‐resistant to dicofol), were compared for their fecundity without insecticide treatment and for their ovipositional response to foliar and drench applications of the field‐relevant dose of imidacloprid (100 mg litre−1). Without insecticide treatment, strain GSS laid significantly more eggs (162.50 (±5.43)) than the multiple resistant strain Akita (139.90 (±5.54)) during a 16 day oviposition period. With imidacloprid treatment the highest effect was observed with GSS, with a significantly reduced number of eggs in drench (143.40 (±4.22)) and foliar (144.60 (±5.85)) applications. For strains Akita and USA, no significant differences were observed in oviposition between imidacloprid treatments and controls. The proportion of F1 female offspring decreased significantly with drench application for GSS and WI, while no differences were observed among strains in the survival of F1 immature stages, except for strain USA. The viability of eggs was relatively high (from 82.9 (±4.5)% for USA to 95.2 (±1.2)% for GSS) and not affected by imidacloprid treatments. Copyright © 2006 Society of Chemical IndustryKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Resistance of insect pests to neonicotinoid insecticides: Current status and future prospectsArchives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2005
- Neonicotinoid InsecticidesPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Identification of biochemical markers linked to neonicotinoid cross resistance in Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae)Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 2003
- SELECTIVE TOXICITY OF NEONICOTINOIDS ATTRIBUTABLE TO SPECIFICITY OF INSECT AND MAMMALIAN NICOTINIC RECEPTORSAnnual Review of Entomology, 2003
- New modes of action of insecticidesPesticide Outlook, 2002
- Effect of Temperature on Development and Demographic Parameters of Tetranychus urticae and Eotetranychus carpini borealis (Acari: Tetranychidae)Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2001
- Acaricide toxicity and resistance in larvae of different strains of Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi (Acari: Tetranychidae)Pest Management Science, 2001
- Resistance to Organophosphates and Biochemical Genotyping of Acetylcholinesterases in Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2001
- Acetylcholine Receptors as Sites for Developing Neonicotinoid InsecticidesPublished by Springer Nature ,2001
- Some factors affecting reproduction and sex ratios in two species of predacious mites, Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot and Amblyseius andersoni (Chant) (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)Canadian Journal of Zoology, 1978