Facemasks and Hand Hygiene to Prevent Influenza Transmission in Households
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 6 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 151 (7) , 437-446
- https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-7-200910060-00142
Abstract
Background: Few data are available about the effectiveness of nonpharmaceutical interventions for preventing influenza virus transmission. Objective: To investigate whether hand hygiene and use of facemasks prevents household transmission of influenza. Design: Cluster randomized, controlled trial. Randomization was computer generated; allocation was concealed from treating physicians and clinics and implemented by study nurses at the time of the initial household visit. Participants and personnel administering the interventions were not blinded to group assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00425893) Setting: Households in Hong Kong. Patients: 407 people presenting to outpatient clinics with influenza-like illness who were positive for influenza A or B virus by rapid testing (index patients) and 794 household members (contacts) in 259 households. Intervention: Lifestyle education (control) (134 households), hand hygiene (136 households), or surgical facemasks plus hand hygiene (137 households) for all household members. Measurements: Influenza virus infection in contacts, as confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or diagnosed clinically after 7 days. Results: Sixty (8%) contacts in the 259 households had RT-PCR–confirmed influenza virus infection in the 7 days after intervention. Hand hygiene with or without facemasks seemed to reduce influenza transmission, but the differences compared with the control group were not significant. In 154 households in which interventions were implemented within 36 hours of symptom onset in the index patient, transmission of RT-PCR–confirmed infection seemed reduced, an effect attributable to fewer infections among participants using facemasks plus hand hygiene (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.87]). Adherence to interventions varied. Limitation: The delay from index patient symptom onset to intervention and variable adherence may have mitigated intervention effectiveness. Conclusion: Hand hygiene and facemasks seemed to prevent household transmission of influenza virus when implemented within 36 hours of index patient symptom onset. These findings suggest that nonpharmaceutical interventions are important for mitigation of pandemic and interpandemic influenza. Primary Funding Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors affecting QuickVue Influenza A + B rapid test performance in the community settingDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2009
- Comparison of nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and aspirates for rapid diagnosis of respiratory viruses in childrenJournal of Clinical Virology, 2008
- Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza PandemicJAMA, 2007
- The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: Measuring disease burden and costsVaccine, 2007
- Public health interventions and epidemic intensity during the 1918 influenza pandemicProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast AsiaNature, 2005
- Effect of handwashing on child health: a randomised controlled trialPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Does This Patient Have Influenza?JAMA, 2005
- Management of Influenza in Households: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Oseltamivir Treatment With or Without Postexposure ProphylaxisThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2004
- Zanamivir Prophylaxis: An Effective Strategy for the Prevention of Influenza Types A and B within HouseholdsThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002