Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations
- 1 February 2003
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 47 (1) , 33-53
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702239510
Abstract
Event history models have become a dominant method of analysis in the study of international relations. Conventional event history models, however, retain the assumption that the effects of the covariates remain proportional to each other throughout the duration of the subject's phase. Nonproportional hazard (NPH) models are used, which allow for the effects of covariates to vary over time. These models are then applied to three previously established data sets on the duration of postwar peace, civil wars, and alliances. Results show that NPH analysis is a useful method for testing new hypotheses, as well as removing possible sources of bias from existing analyses.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision MakingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2001
- Killing Time: The World Politics of Civil War Duration, 1820-1992International Studies Quarterly, 2000
- How Long Do Economic Sanctions Last? Examining the Sanctioning Process through DurationPolitical Research Quarterly, 2000
- Integrating and Testing Models of Rivalry DurationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1998
- Time is of the Essence: Event History Models in Political ScienceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1997
- Testing Alternative Models of Alliance Duration, 1816-1984American Journal of Political Science, 1997
- The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade AgreementAmerican Political Science Review, 1997
- Security, Bargaining, and the End of Interstate RivalryInternational Studies Quarterly, 1996
- The Duration of Interstate Wars, 1816–1985American Political Science Review, 1996
- The Causes of WarPublished by Springer Nature ,1988