Forward to the Past? The Case of 'New Production Concepts'
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Industrial Relations
- Vol. 33 (2) , 155-177
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002218569103300201
Abstract
In the 1980s a growing number of books and articles utilized the terms 'post-Fordism; 'post-Taylorism ; 'flexible specialization' and 'new production concepts: This paper explores a number of common themes which have been developed under these separate titles. It is argued that many of these concepts do not represent a clear break from past theoretical traditions. Rather, they offer a restatement of many of the ideas found in Industrialism and Industrial Man (Kerr et al. 1960a). Moreover, it is argued that a number of conceptual and empirical problems exist that invalidate many of the claims made by adherents to these various labels. Particular attention is paid to Australian contributors to the debate, most notably, to the work of John Mathews.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- The reality of workplace flexibilityCapital & Class, 1990
- NEW PRODUCTION CONCEPTSPrometheus, 1989
- Flexible Specialisation, Automation and Mass ProductionWork, Employment & Society, 1989
- Equal pay, comparable worth and the central wage fixing systemAustralian Feminist Studies, 1988
- The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. By Michael J. Piore and Charles F. Sabel. (New York: Basic Books, 1984. Pp. 335. $21.95.)American Political Science Review, 1985
- Industrial Relations Theory: Painting by NumbersJournal of Industrial Relations, 1984
- Work and Social Character: Old and New ContoursEconomic and Industrial Democracy, 1984
- The Australian System of Industrial Relations: An Analytical ModelJournal of Industrial Relations, 1980
- THE ?CONVERGENCE? CONTROVERSY REVISITEDKyklos, 1976
- The Scientific Legitimation of Fallacy: Neutralizing Social Change TheoryAmerican Sociological Review, 1971