Factors Influencing Referrals for Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis
- 1 August 1984
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 24 (3) , 198-201
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828x.1984.tb01489.x
Abstract
The results of an investigation into factors influencing the referral of women for prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis, following mid-2nd-trimester amniocentesis are reported. The overall diagnostic amniocentesis rate for wonen over the age of 35 yr was 16.8%. Consecutive Brisbane [Australia] women (104) referred to the 2 laboratories offering chromosome analysis of amniotic fluid cells were included in this study. Women (72%) were referred for advanced maternal age. The socioeconomic status (SES) of the 140 women was skewed very significantly towards the professional and semiprofessional classes (Classes A and B on the Congalton Australian Four-point Scale). Of all women 27% are in SES Class D in the Brisbane population, but only 7.4% of such women (SES Class D) were within the group studied. Women 49% indicated that they themselves raised the question of prenatal diagnosis with their doctor. Diagnostic amniocentesis is not acceptable to a certain proportion of couples, but it is estimated that 60% would accept it if there were medical indications and if it were offered. Of those women who are at increased risk of having a child with a significant chromosomal abnormality (including those over the age of 35 yr) and to whom prenatal diagnosis is acceptable, 28% are actually receiving it in current practice. Those who do are a well informed, self-motivated upper and middle class group.This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in utilization of prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis by New York State residents in 1979 and 1980.American Journal of Public Health, 1983
- The Utilization of Prenatal Cytogenetic Diagnosis in Western AustraliaAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983
- Women's experiences with second trimester prenatal diagnosisPrenatal Diagnosis, 1982
- The influence of obstetricians on the utilization of amniocentesisPrenatal Diagnosis, 1982
- Prenatal diagnosis for the detection of down syndrome: Why are so few eligible women tested?Prenatal Diagnosis, 1981
- Utilization of prenatal genetic diagnosis in women 35 years of age and older in the United States, 1977 to 1978American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981
- Acceptance of amniocentesis by low-income patients in an urban hospitalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1980
- Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis and the LawPublished by Springer Nature ,1980
- Prenatal genetic diagnosis and elective abortion in women over 35: Utilization and relative impact on the birth prevalence of Down syndrome in Washington StateAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 1980
- PLANNING AN AMNIOCENTESIS SERVICE FOR DOWN SYNDROMEThe Lancet, 1979