Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations
Top Cited Papers
- 13 April 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Oecologia
- Vol. 144 (1) , 1-11
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-005-0070-z
Abstract
Plant invasions often involve rapid evolutionary change. Founder effects, hybridization, and adaptation to novel environments cause genetic differentiation between native and introduced populations and may contribute to the success of invaders. An influential idea in this context has been the Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability (EICA) hypothesis. It proposes that after enemy release plants rapidly evolve to be less defended but more competitive, thereby increasing plant vigour in introduced populations. To detect evolutionary change in invaders, comparative studies of native versus introduced populations are needed. Here, we review the current empirical evidence from: (1) comparisons of phenotypic variation in natural populations; (2) comparisons of molecular variation with neutral genetic markers; (3) comparisons of quantitative genetic variation in a common environment; and (4) comparisons of phenotypic plasticity across different environments. Field data suggest that increased vigour and reduced herbivory are common in introduced plant populations. In molecular studies, the genetic diversity of introduced populations was not consistently different from that of native populations. Multiple introductions of invasive plants appear to be the rule rather than the exception. In tests of the EICA hypothesis in a common environment, several found increased growth or decreased resistance in introduced populations. However, few provided a full test of the EICA hypothesis by addressing growth and defence in the same species. Overall, there is reasonable empirical evidence to suggest that genetic differentiation through rapid evolutionary change is important in plant invasions. We discuss conceptual and methodological issues associated with cross-continental comparisons and make recommendations for future research. When testing for EICA, greater emphasis should be put on competitive ability and plant tolerance. Moreover, it is important to address evolutionary change in characteristics other than defence and growth that could play a role in plant invasions.Keywords
This publication has 102 references indexed in Scilit:
- Molecular evidence for multiple introductions of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) to North AmericaMolecular Ecology, 2005
- Variation in growth pattern and response to slug damage among native and invasive provenances of four perennial Brassicaceae speciesJournal of Ecology, 2005
- Soil biota and exotic plant invasionNature, 2004
- Are alien plants more competitive than their native conspecifics? A test using Hypericum perforatum L.Oecologia, 2003
- Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake: response of seedlings to water and pH levelsOecologia, 2001
- Genetic Variation and Molecular Biogeography of a North American Invasive Plant Species (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae)International Journal of Plant Sciences, 2001
- Benign Environments do not Explain the Increased Vigour of Non-indigenous Plants: A Cross-continental Transplant ExperimentBiocontrol Science and Technology, 1999
- Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability in Invasive Nonindigenous Plants: A HypothesisJournal of Ecology, 1995
- Resistance among Populations of Yellow Starthistle to Thistle-Head Insects: Results from Garden Plots in ItalyBiological Control, 1994
- Genetic Variation in Bromus tectorum (Poaceae): Population Differentiation in Its North American RangeAmerican Journal of Botany, 1991