Success and Failure of the Defibrillation Shock:
- 1 July 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
- Vol. 11 (7) , 785-796
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2000.tb00050.x
Abstract
This simulation study presents a further inquiry into the mechanisms by which a strong electric shock fails to halt life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. The research uses a model of the defibrillation process that represents a sheet of myocardium as a bidomain. The tissue consists of nonuniformly curved fibers in which spiral wave reentry is initiated. Monophasic defibrillation shocks are delivered via two line electrodes that occupy opposite tissue boundaries. In some simulation experiments, the polarity of the shock is reversed. Electrical activity in the sheet is compared for failed and successful shocks under controlled conditions. The maps of transmembrane potential and activation times calculated during and after the shock demonstrate that weak shocks fail to terminate the reentrant activity via two major mechanisms. As compared with strong shocks, weak shocks result in (1) smaller extension of refractoriness in the areas depolarized by the shock, and (2) slower or incomplete activation of the excitable gap created by deexcitation of the negatively polarized areas. In its turn, mechanism 2 is associated with one or more of the following events: (a) lack of some break excitations, (b) latency in the occurrence of the break excitations, and (c) slower propagation through deexcited areas. Reversal of shock polarity results in a change of the extent of the regions of deexcitation, and thus, in a change in defibrillation threshold. The results of this study indicate the paramount importance of shock-induced deexcitation in both defibrillation and postshock arrhythmogenesis.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patterns of and mechanisms for shock-induced polarization in the heart: a bidomain analysisIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1999
- The role of cardiac tissue structure in defibrillationChaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 1998
- ABSTRACT SESSION 21: BASIC SCIENCE III: ACTIVATION AND HEPOLAHIZATION PATTERNS IN ARRHYTHMIA MODELSPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- On the Mechanism of Ventricular DefibrillationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- Effects of Waveform and Polarity on Defibrillation Thresholds in Humans Using a Transvenous Lead SystemThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Strength‐Interval Curves for Cardiac Tissue Predicted Using the Bidomain ModelJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 1996
- Effects of Polarity for Monophasic and Biphasic Shocks on Defibrillation Efficacy with an Endocardial SystemPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1996
- Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leadsThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1989
- Transient Responses of Purkinje Fibres to Non-uniform CurrentsNature, 1963