An Examination of Emergent Norms and Emergent Social Structures in Collective Behavior Situations
- 1 August 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Sociological Focus
- Vol. 21 (3) , 233-243
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.1988.10570981
Abstract
Although the emergent norm, emergent social structure perspective has been lauded for studying collective behavior, the perspective has not been put to empirical use. In this paper, we use the emergent norm, emergent social structure perspective to describe and analyze collective behavior incidents. These incidents were precipitated by traveling evangelical preachers at a large midwestern university. Data were gathered for this study through systematic observation (including photography), field notes, and informant discussions. We found that the emergent norm, emergent social structure perspective can be used to describe collective behavior and can facilitate understanding why collective behavior occurs.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collective Locomotion as Collective BehaviorAmerican Sociological Review, 1986
- Organization, Rationality and Spontaneity in the Civil Rights MovementAmerican Sociological Review, 1984
- Social Movement Locals: Modal Member StructuresSociological Analysis, 1984
- Methodological, Ideological, and Conceptual-Theoretical Criticisms of the Field of Collective Behavior: A Critical Evaluation and Implications for Future StudySociological Focus, 1983
- VICTORY CELEBRATIONS AS THEATER: A DRAMATURGICAL APPROACH TO CROWD BEHAVIOR*Symbolic Interaction, 1981
- The Not-So-Lonely Crowd: Friendship Groups in Collective BehaviorSociometry, 1977
- A Gaming Approach to Crowd BehaviorAmerican Sociological Review, 1974
- The Assembling Process: A Theoretical and Empirical ExaminationAmerican Sociological Review, 1973
- Patterns of Belief In Social Movements: Clarifications from an Analysis of Environmental GroupsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1973
- Note on the drawing power of crowds of different size.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969