Emerging Credentialing Practices, Malpractice Liability Policies, and Guidelines Governing Complementary and Alternative Medical Practices and Dietary Supplement Recommendations
- 14 February 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in Archives of internal medicine (1960)
- Vol. 165 (3) , 289-295
- https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.3.289
Abstract
Background Little is known about policies governing the integration of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies and providers. Methods To document emerging approaches in 19 US hospitals regarding credentialing, malpractice liability, and pharmacy policies governing integration of CAM therapies and providers into conventional medical settings, we surveyed 21 academic medical centers and 13 non–academically affiliated hospitals that are nationally visible and are integrating CAM therapies into conventional medical settings. Of the 19 respondents, 11 were tertiary care hospitals, 6 were community hospitals, 1 was a freestanding center associated with a community-based hospital, and 1 was a university-based rehabilitation hospital. Results Institutions had no consistent approach to provider mix and authority within the integrative care team, and minimum requirements for professional liability insurance, informed consent disclosure, and hiring status. Less than a third had a formal (stated) policy concerning dietary supplements; those selling supplements in their pharmacy lacked consistent, evidence-based rationales regarding which products and brands to include or exclude. Although many hospitals confiscated patient supplements on admission, institutions had inconsistent criteria regarding allowance of home supply. Conclusions Hospitals are using heterogeneous approaches to address licensure, credentialing, scope of practice, malpractice liability, and dietary supplement use in developing models of integrative care. The environment creates significant impediments to the delivery of consistent clinical care and multisite evaluations of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness (or lack thereof) of CAM therapies (or integrative models) as applied to management of common medical conditions. Consensus policies need to be developed.This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Issues in the management of dietary supplement use among hospitalized patientsJournal of Medical Toxicology, 2005
- Credentialing Complementary and Alternative Medical ProvidersAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Ethical Considerations of Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies in Conventional Medical SettingsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Potential Physician Malpractice Liability Associated with Complementary and Integrative Medical TherapiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2002
- Book Reviews : Beyond Complementary Medicine: Legal and Ethical Perspectives on Health Care and Human Evolution. Michael H. Cohen. (2001). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. $39.50, 208 pp., hardcover. ISBN: 0-472-11135-3Complementary health practice review, 2001
- Evolution of a policy disallowing the use of alternative therapies in a health system.American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2000
- Personal and professional beliefs and practices regarding herbal medicine among the full time faculty of the newark-based schools of the university of medicine and dentistry of new jerseyIntegrative Medicine, 2000
- Legal Implications of Practicing Alternative MedicinePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1999
- Medical Malpractice Implications of Alternative MedicineJAMA, 1998
- Advising Patients Who Seek Alternative Medical TherapiesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997