Fluid Resuscitation Strategies: A Systematic Review of Animal Trials
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health
- Vol. 55 (3) , 571-589
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000062968.69867.6f
Abstract
Our objective was to systematically review randomized, controlled trials of fluid resuscitation in animal models of uncontrolled hemorrhage and to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. We conducted an electronic bibliographic search of published research, reviewed reference lists of included trials, and contacted authors about unpublished studies. We included all unconfounded, randomized, controlled trials of fluid resuscitation (timing, volume, or resuscitation targets) in animal models of uncontrolled hemorrhage. The outcome measure was mortality at the end of the scheduled follow-up period of the trial. Two reviewers independently applied the selection criteria to the trial reports. A third reviewer resolved disagreements. Forty-four trials compared fluid versus no fluid resuscitation. There was marked heterogeneity in the effect of fluid resuscitation on the risk of death, much of which was explained by the hemorrhage model used. In aortic injury models, the adjusted relative risk of death with fluid resuscitation was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33–0.71). In organ incision models, the adjusted relative risk of death was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.49–1.18). In tail resection models, the adjusted relative risk of death was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.38–1.25) if 50% or more was removed and 1.86 (95% CI, 1.13–3.07) if less than 50% was removed. In other vascular injury models, the adjusted relative risk of death with fluid resuscitation was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.01–2.85), respectively. Nine trials compared hypotensive versus normotensive resuscitation. The relative risk of death with hypotensive resuscitation was 0.37 (95% CI, 0.27–0.50). Fluid resuscitation appears to reduce the risk of death in animal models of severe hemorrhage but increases the risk of death in those with less severe hemorrhage. Excessive fluid resuscitation could therefore be harmful in some situations. Hypotensive resuscitation reduced the risk of death in all the trials investigating it. An evaluation of the potential impact of hypotensive resuscitation in humans could now be warranted.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does animal experimentation inform human healthcare? Observations from a systematic review of international animal experiments on fluid resuscitationBMJ, 2002
- Prehospital Resuscitation with Phenylephrine in Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic Shock and Brain InjuryPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,2000
- Controlled Resuscitation for Uncontrolled Hemorrhagic ShockThe Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 1999
- Early isotonic saline resuscitation from uncontrolled hemorrhage in ratsSurgery, 1998
- Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990–2020: Global Burden of Disease StudyPublished by Elsevier ,1997
- LOW-DOSE HYPERTONIC SALINE (NaCI 8.0%) TREATMENT OF UNCONTROLLED ABDOMINAL HEMORRHAGEShock, 1996
- Uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock outcome model in ratsResuscitation, 1995
- AB or ABC: pre-hospital fluid management in major trauma.Emergency Medicine Journal, 1994
- A comparison of the response of near-fatal acute hemorrhage models with and without a vascular injury to rapid volume expansionThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 1993
- Use of hypertonic saline/dextran versus lactated ringer's solution as a resuscitation fluid after uncontrolled aortic hemorrhage in anesthetized swineAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1992