Hypospadias repair: the two‐stage alternative
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley
- Vol. 76 (6) , 31-41
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1995.tb07815.x
Abstract
One-stage repairs for hypospadias are attractive in concept and are currently in vogue, but many surgeons remain unhappy with their inherent limitations and drawbacks. Two-stage repair, reconstructing the new urethra with a full-thickness skin graft, offers a realistic alternative and the method described here can be applied to almost any degree of deformity, be it a simple primary case or salvage of a multi-operated and skin-deficient hypospadias 'cripple'. From a personal series of over 600 cases the author concludes that a two-stage operation is an acceptable price to pay for a repair that offers unique versatility, excellent reliability and a sophistication of function and aesthetics that is hard to achieve with one-stage methods.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- A long-term view of hypospadiasBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1989
- Experience with a Modification of the Cloutier Technique for Hypospadias RepairJournal of Urology, 1988
- Micturition Studies and Sexual Function in Operated HypospadiacsBritish Journal of Urology, 1983
- Timing of Elective Hypospadias Repair in ChildrenPediatrics, 1983
- Observations Upon Techniques for Reconstruction of the Urethral Meatus, the Hypospadiac Glans Deformity, and the Penile UrethraUrologic Clinics of North America, 1979
- Improved repairs in 100 cases of penile hypospadiasBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1976
- A long-term follow-up of hypospadias patientsBritish Journal of Plastic Surgery, 1975
- Aftereffects of Hypospadias Repair in ChildhoodPostgraduate Medicine, 1970
- A METHOD FOR HYPOSPADIAS REPAIRPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 1962
- A one-stage operation for hypospadiasBritish Journal of Surgery, 1941