Further differences between brain-stem auditory potentials evoked by rarefaction and condensation clicks as revealed by vector analysis
- 31 March 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
- Vol. 66 (4) , 420-426
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(87)90211-2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I–V: Results of a spatio-temporal dipole modelElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- Uncertainties of topodiagnosis of auditory nerve and brain-stem auditory evoked potentials due to rarefaction and condensation stimuliElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section, 1985
- The influence of click phase and rate upon latencies and latency distributions of the normal brain-stem auditory evoked potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1984
- Auditory evoked potentials recorded from the cochlear nucleus and its vicinity in manJournal of Neurosurgery, 1983
- Evoked Potentials in Clinical MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Vector analysis of auditory evoked potential in the brain stemInternational Journal of Bio-Medical Computing, 1982
- Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) to Rarefaction and Condensation Clicks in Normal and Abnormal EarsScandinavian Audiology, 1982
- The importance of phase of stimulus and the reference recording electrode in brain stem auditory evoked potentialsElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1981
- Nonpathologic Factors Influencing Brainstem Auditory Evoked PotentialsAmerican Journal of EEG Technology, 1978
- The effect of sound pressure waveform on human brain stem auditory evoked responsesBrain Research, 1975