Does Prospect Theory Explain the Disposition Effect?
- 22 December 2005
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
The disposition effect is the observation that investors hold winning stocks too long and sell losing stocks too early. A standard explanation of the disposition effect refers to prospect theory and in particular to the asymmetric risk aversion according to which investors are risk averse when faced with gains and risk-seeking when faced with losses. We show that for reasonable parameter values the disposition effect can however not be explained by prospect theory as proposed by Kahneman and Tversky. The reason is that those investors who sell winning stocks and hold loosing assets would in the first place not have invested in stocks. That is to say the standard prospect theory argument is sound ex-post, assuming that the investment has taken place, but not ex-ante, requiring that the investment is made in the first place.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospect theory and liquidation decisionsJournal of Economic Theory, 2006
- Portfolio Choice and Trading Volume with Loss‐Averse InvestorsThe Journal of Business, 2005
- Optimal Portfolio Choice under Loss AversionThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004
- Do Professional Traders Exhibit Loss Realization AversionSSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- Disposition Effect and Firm Size: New Evidence on Individual Investor Trading ActivitySSRN Electronic Journal, 2001
- The investment behavior and performance of various investor types: a study of Finland's unique data setJournal of Financial Economics, 2000
- Psychological Factors and Stock Option ExerciseThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1999
- Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?The Journal of Finance, 1998
- The Disposition to Sell Winners Too Early and Ride Losers Too Long: Theory and EvidenceThe Journal of Finance, 1985
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979