Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease
- 1 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 44 (11) , 2185-2191
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.059
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Direct effects of dobutamine on the coronary microcirculation: comparison with adenosine using myocardial contrast echocardiographyJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2003
- Part II: Recent Advances in Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography. Clinical Experience in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease with Myocardial Contrast EchocardiographyEchocardiography, 2002
- Perfusion Versus Function: The Ischemic Cascade in Demand IschemiaCirculation, 2002
- Assessment of myocardial perfusion with contrast echocardiography at rest and with stress: An emerging technologyProgress in Cardiovascular Diseases, 2000
- Accuracy of dobutamine technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT imaging for the diagnosis of single-vessel coronary artery disease: Comparison with echocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 2000
- Basis for detection of stenosis using venous administration of microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography: bolus or continuous infusion?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1998
- Myocardial contrast echocardiographyCurrent Problems in Cardiology, 1997
- Atropine augmentation in dobutamine stress echocardiography: Role and incremental value in a clinical practice settingJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Dobutamine-induced hypoperfusion without transient wall motion abnormalities: Less severe ischemia or less severe stress?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1996
- Optimal use of dobutamine stress for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease: Combination with echocardiography or scintigraphy, or both?Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1993