Results of a Phase II Study of Weekly Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Patients With Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2, or Age ≥ 70 Years
- 15 May 2004
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 22 (10) , 1872-1877
- https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2004.11.023
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the 1-year survival, response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP), and safety of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Performance Status performance status (PS) of 2 or an age ≥ 70 years. Patients and Methods: Patients were treated with PC (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 and carboplatin area under the curve = 2) by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle for up to six cycles. Results: Between July 2000 and December 2001, 77 eligible patients (50.6% were male, 97.4% were white, 44.2% had PS of 2, with median age of 74 years) with ESCLC were enrolled. Among the 66 patients who were assessable for response, 25 responded to treatment (one complete response and 24 partial responses), for an objective RR of 38%. There were eight cases of stable disease (12.1%) and 33 cases of progressive disease (50%). The median survival was 7.2 months (range, < 1 to 24.4 months), and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 30%. The median TTP was 3.5 months (range, < 1 to 21.2 months), and the estimated 1-year progression-free survival rate was 8%. The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 1.6 to 17.5 months). One death (sepsis) was possibly related to the study drugs. Grades 3 and 4 toxicities experienced by ≥ 5% of patients included neutropenia (22.1%), fatigue (8.6%), anemia (5.2%), and nausea/vomiting (5.2%). Conclusion: This regimen produced relatively few toxicities (only two of the 66 assessable patients received fewer than two cycles because of toxicity), and both the median and 1-year survival were similar to other regimens. This regimen may be a preferable treatment choice for patients with ESCLC who have a poor PS or who are aged ≥ 70 years.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Phase II Study of Carboplatin and Vinorelbine in Patients with Poor Prognosis Small Cell Lung CancerClinical Oncology, 2003
- Irinotecan plus Cisplatin Compared with Etoposide plus Cisplatin for Extensive Small-Cell Lung CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- A prospective study of gemcitabine and carboplatin as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Toxicity of a three- versus a four-week scheduleSeminars in Oncology, 2001
- Paclitaxel added to the cisplatin/etoposide regimen in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer — the use of complete response rate as the primary endpoint in phase II trialsLung Cancer, 2001
- Extensive stage small cell lung cancerCurrent Treatment Options in Oncology, 2001
- Treatment and Outcomes for Elderly Patients with Small Cell Lung CancerDrugs & Aging, 2000
- 81 One hour paclitaxel plus carboplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results of a Minnie Pearl cancer research network phase II studyLung Cancer, 1997
- Oral Etoposide and CarboplatinAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Carboplatin (JM8) as a single agent and in combination in the treatment of small cell lung cancerCancer Treatment Reviews, 1985
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958