Relation between experimental and non-experimental study designs. HB vaccines: a case study
Open Access
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
- Vol. 53 (1) , 51-54
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.53.1.51
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the relation between experimental and non-experimental study design in vaccinology. DESIGN: Assessment of each study design's capability of testing four aspects of vaccine performance, namely immunogenicity (the capacity to stimulate the immune system), duration of immunity conferred, incidence and seriousness of side effects, and number of infections prevented by vaccination. SETTING: Experimental and non-experimental studies on hepatitis B (HB) vaccines in the Cochrane Vaccines Field Database. RESULTS: Experimental and non-experimental vaccine study designs are frequently complementary but some aspects of vaccine quality can only be assessed by one of the types of study. More work needs to be done on the relation between study quality and its significance in terms of effect size.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- New and not so new vaccinesBMJ, 1996
- Global status of hepatitis B immunisationThe Lancet, 1996
- Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health careBMJ, 1996
- The quest for trials on the efficacy of human vaccines. Results of the handsearch of VaccineVaccine, 1996
- Predictors of Hepatitis B Vaccine Acceptance in Health Care WorkersMedical Care, 1996
- Empirical Evidence of BiasJAMA, 1995
- Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trialsJAMA, 1995
- Universal hepatitis B immunization: the British Columbia experienceVaccine, 1995
- Universal hepatitis B immunization: the British Columbia experienceVaccine, 1995
- European vaccine manufacturers: present status and future trendsVaccine, 1992