Low-cost laparoscopic cholecystectomy
- 2 December 2002
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 89 (12) , 1602-1607
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02273.x
Abstract
Background Hospital managers are continually trying to decrease the cost of patient care. The aim of this prospective study was to propose changes that would decrease the operating room costs of laparoscopic cholecystectomy without affecting clinical results. Methods The study included 112 consecutive patients who underwent an elective cholecystectomy between January 1997 and December 2000. The procedure was changed in eight ways: the American position, open laparoscopy, reusable trocars, reusable instruments, bipolar coagulation of the cystic artery, intracorporeal ligature of the cystic duct, no use of suction lavage apparatus, and use of a surgical glove as a bag to extract the gallbladder. Complete compliance with the procedure, whether any abnormal operative events or complications occurred, the duration of hospitalization, and the material and labour costs of the procedure were recorded. Results There were no abnormal operative events. Only two patients suffered from postoperative complications. The mean duration of hospitalization was 55·8 h. Fifteen patients (13·4 per cent) were not hospitalized overnight. The operating costs fell from 560 euros before the study to 330 euros in 2000. Conclusion By applying simple measures, it is possible to decrease the operating room cost of laparoscopic cholecystectomy whilst maintaining good results. Such measures should be applied to other laparoscopic procedures.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Good Buy? A Cost Comparison with Small-incision (Mini) CholecystectomyThe European Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Analgesic effect of low‐dose intrathecal morphine and bupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomyAnaesthesia, 2000
- A safe and simple method for routine open access in laparoscopic procedures.Surgical Endoscopy, 1999
- Direct trocar insertion versus veress needle insertion in laparoscopic cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1999
- Risks of the Minimal Access Approach for Laparoscopic Surgery: Multivariate Analysis of Morbidity Related to Umbilical Trocar InsertionWorld Journal of Surgery, 1997
- Openversus closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997
- A cost-minimization analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1996
- Where Are the Costs in Perioperative Care?: Analysis of Hospital Costs and Charges for Inpatient Surgical CareAnesthesiology, 1995
- Evaluation of the cost of laparoscopic and open cholecystectomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994
- Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: The European experienceThe American Journal of Surgery, 1993