Understanding Ageing
- 23 November 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Gerontology
- Vol. 47 (6) , 341-352
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000052825
Abstract
Background: Cross-sectional studies of samples varying widely in age have found moderate to high levels of shared age-related variance among measures of cognitive and physiological capabilities, leading researchers to posit common factors or common causal influences for diverse age-related phenomenon. Objective: The influence of population average changes with age on cross-sectional estimates of association has not been widely appreciated in developmental and ageing research. Covariances among age-related variables in cross-sectional studies are highly confounded in regards to inferences about associations among rates of change within individuals since covariances can result from a number of sources including average population age-related differences (fixed age effects) in addition to initial individual differences and individual differences in rates of ageing (random age effects). Analysis of narrow age-cohort samples may provide a superior analytical basis for testing hypotheses regarding associations between rates of change in cross-sectional studies. Conclusions: The use of age-heterogeneous cross-sectional designs for evaluating interdependence of ageing-related processes is discouraged since associations will not necessarily reflect individual-level correlated rates of change. Typical cross-sectional studies do not provide sufficient evidence for the interdependence of ageing-related changes and should not serve as the basis for theories and hypotheses of ageing. Reanalyzing existing cross-sectional studies using a sequential narrow-age cohort approach provides a useful alternative for evaluating associations between ageing-related changes. Longitudinal designs, however, provide a much stronger basis for inference regarding associations between rates of ageing within individuals.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Can We Learn About Developmental Processes From Cross-Sectional Studies, or Can We?American Journal of Psychiatry, 2000
- How Strong Is the Evidence for Mediational Hypotheses of Age-Related Memory Loss?Gerontology, 1999
- Construct Overlap in Resource Theories of Memory AgingGerontology, 1999
- From the Present to the FutureGerontology, 1999
- Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships among age, cognition, and processing speed.Psychology and Aging, 1999
- Interrelationships among biological markers of aging, health, activity, acculturation, and cognitive performance in late adulthood.Psychology and Aging, 1999
- The complex nature of unique and shared effects in hierarchical linear regression: Implications for developmental psychology.Psychological Methods, 1998
- Shared age-related influences on cognitive and noncognitive variables.Psychology and Aging, 1998
- Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: A new window to the study of cognitive aging?Psychology and Aging, 1997
- Sensory functioning and intelligence in old age: A strong connection.Psychology and Aging, 1994