Taking Stock Of Pay-For-Performance: A Candid Assessment From The Front Lines
- 1 March 2009
- journal article
- Published by Health Affairs (Project Hope) in Health Affairs
- Vol. 28 (2) , 517-525
- https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.517
Abstract
Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been widely adopted, but it remains unclear how providers are responding and whether results are meeting expectations. Physician organizations involved in the California Integrated Healthcare Association’s (IHA) P4P program reported having increased physician-level performance feedback and accountability, speeded up information technology adoption, and sharpened their organizational focus and support for improvement in response to P4P; however, after three years of investment, these changes had not translated into breakthrough quality improvements. Continued monitoring is required to determine whether early investments made by physician organizations provide a basis for greater improvements in the future.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Beyond Pay for Performance — Emerging Models of Provider-Payment ReformNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- The Impact Of Pay-For-Performance On Health Care Quality In Massachusetts, 2001–2003Health Affairs, 2008
- Climbing Up The Pay-For-Performance Learning Curve: Where Are The Early Adopters Now?Health Affairs, 2007
- Does Pay-for-Performance Improve the Quality of Health Care?Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Paying for PerformanceQuality Management in Health Care, 2005
- The Provision of Incentives in FirmsJournal of Economic Literature, 1999