Genotoxicity testing using the Mutatox™ assay: Evaluation of benzo[a]pyrene as a positive control
- 1 May 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
- Vol. 16 (5) , 857-861
- https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160504
Abstract
In a study on bioassay-directed chemical factionation of sediment extracts, problems were encountered using benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) as a positive control in the Mutatox™ bacterial genotoxicity assay. Genotoxic responses of tests with this compound, prescribed by the Mutatox supplier, could only be measured using supersaturated concentrations that exceeded its aqueous solubility more than 250 times. Additional to three obvious requirements for a positive control of this test system (it should demonstrate that the bacteria are alive and grow after reconstitution, that the bacteria are mutated, and that the bacteria emit light), a positive control should meet two criteria: the metabolic routes of genotoxic response induction for positive control and test compound(s) should be identical, and test concentrations (of both positive control and test compound) should be at environmentally relevant concentrations, i.e., below the aqueous solubilities. As BaP does not meet this last criterion, it does not fully qualify as a positive control in testing genotoxicity of solutes with the Mutatox assay. Testing of other unsubstituted polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHS) did not yield another PAH as choice for positive control. Furthermore, the results of our study imply that calculating the bioavailability of BaP from the aqueous solubility alone is not sufficient, as this tends to underestimate the amount of BaP available to either the S9 enzyme system or the bacteria, whereas the interference between toxic and genotoxic effects hampered the interpretation of test results, as variations in toxicity may be interpreted as variations in genotoxicity. Quantitative S9-mediated genotoxicity assessments using the Mutatox test appeared difficult to make, as the two parameters that are proposed by the supplier (CMR, concentration of maximum genotoxic response, and LOEC, lowest observable [genotoxic] effect concentration) showed significant dependency on the sensitivity of the S9 system toward the test compound (CMR) or the initial test compound concentration (LOEC).Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Identification of the Principal Human Cell Mutagen in an Organic Extract of a Mutagenic SedimentEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1994
- Comparative assessment of the SOS Chromotest kit and the Mutatox test with the Salmonella plate incorporation (Ames test) and fluctuation tests for screening genotoxic agentsEnvironmental Toxicology and Water Quality, 1994
- Bioassay‐directed fractionation of organic contaminants in an estuarine sediment using the new mutagenic bioassay, mutatox™Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 1993
- Strategies for the identification of non-polar toxicants in aqueous environmental samples using toxicity-based fractionation and gas chromatography—mass spectrometryJournal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications, 1992
- Genotoxicity in water and sediment extracts from the St Lawrence river system, using the SOS chromotestWater Research, 1992
- Bioassay-directed chemical analysis of genotoxic components in coastal sedimentsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1992
- A microplate version of the SOS/umu-test for rapid detection of genotoxins and genotoxic potentials of environmental samplesMutation Research/Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects, 1991
- Identifying toxicants: NETAC's toxicity-based approachEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1989
- Bioassay-directed chemical analysis in environmental researchAnalytical Chemistry, 1986
- Combined bioassay-chemical fractionation scheme for the determination and ranking of toxic chemicals in sedimentsEnvironmental Science & Technology, 1983