Patient Expectations and Costs of Immediate Reporting of Screening Mammography
- 1 September 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Roentgen Ray Society in American Journal of Roentgenology
- Vol. 177 (3) , 579-583
- https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.177.3.1770579
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. Our purpose was to determine whether patients prefer immediate or delayed results of screening mammography and to determine the cost of immediate reporting at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A survey was anonymously and randomly distributed to 129 women who were 35-70 years old during a visit to their primary care physician, asking the women's preference for receiving mammography results by one of two systems: by letter with a return visit for any additional tests; or by speaking at once with the radiologist, with the option of additional tests being performed during the same visit. Patients' willingness to pay for the latter service was also determined. A cost identification model was constructed using commercially available software. We considered the impact on radiologists' and technologists' time and the need for additional equipment and space, and we analyzed the effect on the cost of immediate reporting. RESULTS. One hundred twenty (93%) surveys were completed. Eighty women (67%) preferred immediate reporting, and 62 (78%) of these 80 patients would wait 30-60 min. The additional cost of immediate reporting is $28.22 per patient. Only 11% of patients were willing to pay this additional cost. When new equipment and space were not required, the cost would increase by $4.38. This cost was most influenced by the time required to give patients normal results. CONCLUSION. Most surveyed patients preferred speaking with a radiologist immediately but were unwilling to pay additional fees. Radiologists, hospital administrators, and health care planners must be aware of the costs of immediate reporting and must factor these costs into any change in hospital or national policy.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- False-Positive Screening Mammograms: Effect of Immediate versus Later Work-up on Patient StressRadiology, 2001
- Patient satisfaction with screening mammography: Online vs off-line interpretationAcademic Radiology, 1998
- Patients' opinion of mammography screening services: immediate results versus delayed results due to interpretation by two observers.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1997
- Physicians' opinions on the delivery of mammographic screening services: immediate interpretation versus double reading.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1996
- Communication of mammography results to women by radiologists: attitudes of referring health care providers.Radiology, 1995
- Telling the patient her mammogram results.American Journal of Roentgenology, 1995
- Women's attitudes about receiving mammographic results directly from radiologists.Radiology, 1994
- When the patient asks for the results of her mammogram, how should the radiologist reply?American Journal of Roentgenology, 1994
- Patient expectations of radiology in noninteractive encounters.Radiology, 1989