?Recognition units? at the top of a neuronal hierarchy?
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Comparative Physiology A
- Vol. 162 (6) , 759-772
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00610965
Abstract
The electric fish,Eigenmannia, is able to discriminate the sign of the frequency difference, Df, between a neighbor's electric organ discharges (EODs) and its own. The fish lowers its EOD frequency for positive Dfs and raises its frequency for negative Dfs to minimize jamming of its electrolocation ability by a neighbor's EODs of similar frequency. This jamming avoidance response (JAR) is controlled by a group of ‘sign-selective’ neurons in the prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) that is located at the boundary of the midbrain and the diencephalon (Fig. 1). Extracellular recordings from a total of 35 neurons revealed a great similarity between behavioral and neuronal response properties: 1. All neurons fired vigorously for negative Dfs and were almost silent for positive Dfs, regardless of the orientation of the jamming stimulus, and thus discriminated the sign of Df unambiguously (Fig. 2). 2. In accordance with behavioral observations, individual neurons failed to discriminate the sign of Df when the jamming stimulus had the same field geometry as the signal mimicking the animal's own EOD (Fig. 3). 3. Df magnitudes which evoke strongest JARs, usually 4 to 8 Hz, also induced most vigorous responses in sign-selective neurons (Fig. 5). 4. Behavioral and neuronal thresholds for the detection of small jamming signals were similar. Threshold for sign selectivity was reached when the amplitude ratio of the jamming signal to the EOD mimic, measured near the head surface, was 0.001. This value corresponds to a maximal temporal disparity (a necessary cue for performing a correct JAR) of 1 to 2 μs for signals received by the two sides of the body in a transverse jamming field (Fig. 7). 5. The effects of two jamming fields, offered orthogonally to each other, may interact nonlinearly at the behavioral as well as at the neuronal level. A positive Df presented in one field may suppress behavioral and neuronal responses to modulations of the sign of Df in the other field (Fig. 8c).Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- The optic tectum of the gymnotiform electric fish, Eigenmannia: Labeling of physiologically identified cellsNeuroscience, 1987
- Gating of sensory information: Joint computations of phase and amplitude data in the midbrain of the electric fish,EigenmanniaJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1986
- Some Principles in the Brain Analysis of Important Signals: Mapping and Stimulus RecognitionBrain, Behavior and Evolution, 1986
- A time-comparison circuit in the electric fish midbrain. I. Behavior and physiologyJournal of Neuroscience, 1986
- Court and spark: electric signals in the courtship and mating of gymnotoid fishAnimal Behaviour, 1985
- The jamming avoidance response ofEigenmannia: properties of a diencephalic link between sensory processing and motor outputJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1984
- The control ofEigenmannia's pacemaker by distributed evaluation of electroreceptive afferencesJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1980
- The Jamming Avoidance Response inEigenmannia revisited: The structure of a neuronal democracyJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1978
- The jamming avoidance response of high frequency electric fishJournal of Comparative Physiology A, 1972
- Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization.Journal of Neurophysiology, 1969